A Buyer’s Guide to Freshworks Alternatives

Finding a Truly Unified IT Platform for 2025?

Is your ITSM platform only managing the logging and workflow of incidents and service requests, while you continue to use multiple, fragmented tools to manage your users and devices? If you’re juggling separate solutions for patch management, endpoint security, remote control, chatbots, Digital Employee Experience (DEX), and Digital Adoption (DAP), then you’re facing a challenge that ticketing systems alone cannot solve.

Platforms like Freshworks, ServiceNow, and ManageEngine have set a high standard for IT Service Management (ITSM). They excel at organizing the chaos of support tickets. But a critical gap remains: they manage the ticket, not the device. This forces IT teams to swivel between dashboards, manually stitch together workflows, and bear the rising costs of “tool sprawl.”

This guide is for IT leaders seeking to move beyond fragmentation. We will explore alternatives to Freshworks by comparing different philosophical approaches to IT management, appreciating the strengths of each tool while highlighting how a unified, automation-first platform presents a more modern and cost-effective path forward.

Understanding the Four Approaches to IT Support

Today, organizations typically fall into one of four models for their IT support stack. Where does your organization fit?

1. The ITSM-Centric Approach (e.g., Freshservice)

This model prioritizes the helpdesk experience.

• Its Strength: Unparalleled in ticket, incident, and SLA management. These tools provide a structured, auditable system for logging and tracking support interactions.
• Its Limitation: These platforms inherently lack native device analytics, remote control, or proactive remediation. Every action on an endpoint requires switching to a different tool, leading to slower resolution times and a disjointed workflow.

2. The Endpoint Management Specialist (e.g., Microsoft Intune)

This model prioritizes device policy and security.

• Its Strength: Excellent for Mobile Device Management (MDM) and applying security policies. The paid “Intune Advanced” add-ons introduce capabilities like Proactive Remediation scripts and Endpoint Analytics.
• Its Limitation: Intune is not an ITSM or a helpdesk. It lacks native ticketing, SLA management, and a user-centric self-service portal for resolving issues. It manages the device, but not the support request lifecycle.

3. The “Best-of-Breed” Enterprise Platform (e.g., ServiceNow)

This model is for large enterprises aiming to build a single platform for multiple departments (IT, HR, Facilities, etc.).

• Its Strength: When implemented successfully for enterprise-wide use cases, it can deliver a powerful, unified experience across the business and provide a strong ROI.
• Its Limitation: The cost and complexity can be immense. For teams focused specifically on IT support and endpoint automation, the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) can be prohibitive, and the platform may be too cumbersome for agile, day-to-day IT management. If you are not leveraging its full multi-departmental power, you may be paying a premium for features you don’t use.

4. The Unified, Automation-First Platform (e.g., Anakage)

This emerging model integrates ITSM, ITAM, and deep endpoint management into a single platform with one agent.

• Its Strength: Designed to eliminate tool sprawl. It allows IT to manage the entire lifecycle of a support request—from ticket creation to proactive, automated remediation—from a single console.
• Its Differentiation: The focus is on automation and self-heal capabilities to resolve issues before they become tickets, drastically reducing the burden on technicians.

Comparative Analysis: A Buyer’s Guide

To move beyond just logging tickets, a modern platform needs to deliver automation, analytics, and self-heal capabilities. Here’s how the alternatives stack up.

Reframing the Value Proposition: More Automation, Less Cost

Instead of comparing line-item pricing, a modern approach evaluates Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) and Return on Investment (ROI).

• “Less for More” Problem: With fragmented tools, you pay more for each separate license (ITSM, endpoint manager, remote tool) but get less efficiency due to manual integrations and context-switching.
• Anakage’s “More for Less” Advantage: Anakage operates on a predictable per-device model that includes unlimited technician licenses. By unifying capabilities and providing powerful automation, it allows organizations to achieve significantly higher levels of autonomous support (reducing manual work by up to 80%) at a fraction of the TCO of a stitched-together stack.

Conclusion: Choose Your Philosophy

Choosing an alternative to Freshworks isn’t about finding a better ticketing system; it’s about choosing a better IT support philosophy.

• If your organization is realizing a strong ROI from ServiceNow across multiple departments, stay blessed.
• If you need a broad toolset and see ManageEngine as a unified fit, it’s a strong contender.
• But if your goal is to achieve the highest level of IT support automation, reduce technician workload, and gain a powerful ROI at a lower TCO, then a truly unified, automation-first platform is the only logical choice.

Anakage is built for this future, empowering you to move from simply managing tickets to creating an autonomous, self-healing IT environment.

Ready to see how a unified platform can transform your IT operations? [Request a Demo of Anakage Today]

Have you read about our last release? Click here to read!